{"id":1383,"date":"2021-09-29T08:57:03","date_gmt":"2021-09-29T11:57:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/?p=1383"},"modified":"2021-10-01T08:57:18","modified_gmt":"2021-10-01T11:57:18","slug":"ministro-gilmar-mendes-cassa-condenacao-de-empresa-por-debitos-trabalhistas-de-outra-do-mesmo-grupo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/2021\/09\/29\/ministro-gilmar-mendes-cassa-condenacao-de-empresa-por-debitos-trabalhistas-de-outra-do-mesmo-grupo\/","title":{"rendered":"Ministro Gilmar Mendes cassa condena\u00e7\u00e3o de empresa por d\u00e9bitos trabalhistas de outra do mesmo grupo"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<section class=\"wp-block-uagb-section uagb-section__wrap uagb-section__background-color uagb-block-f74d399c\"><div class=\"uagb-section__overlay\"><\/div><div class=\"uagb-section__inner-wrap\">\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-uagb-advanced-heading uagb-block-698e5315\"><h3 class=\"uagb-heading-text\"><strong>Boletim Jur\u00eddico n\u00ba 09\/2021 &#8211; 29\/09\/2021 <\/strong><\/h3><div class=\"uagb-separator-wrap\"><div class=\"uagb-separator\"><\/div><\/div><p class=\"uagb-desc-text\"><\/p><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n<\/div><\/section>\n\n\n\n<section class=\"wp-block-uagb-section uagb-section__wrap uagb-section__background-color uagb-block-98163d5c\"><div class=\"uagb-section__overlay\"><\/div><div class=\"uagb-section__inner-wrap\">\n<h2 class=\"has-text-color wp-block-heading\" style=\"color:#0767b1\"><a href=\"javascript:abrir('http:\/\/www.sinicesp.org.br\/materias\/2021\/bj09a.htm')\">Ministro Gilmar Mendes cassa condena\u00e7\u00e3o de empresa por d\u00e9bitos trabalhistas de outra do mesmo grupo<\/a><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p>O ministro Gilmar Mendes, do Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF), cassou decis\u00e3o do Tribunal Superior do Trabalho (TST) que havia mantido a condena\u00e7\u00e3o de uma empresa pelos d\u00e9bitos trabalhistas de outra do mesmo grupo empresarial. Na avalia\u00e7\u00e3o do ministro, a Corte trabalhista desconsiderou o comando do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil (CPC) que pro\u00edbe o cumprimento de senten\u00e7a contra fiador ou correspons\u00e1vel que n\u00e3o tenha participado do processo desde a fase de conhecimento. <br><br>A decis\u00e3o se deu no Recurso Extraordin\u00e1rio com Agravo (ARE 1160361), em que a Amadeus Brasil Ltda. sustentava que o TST, ao permitir a sua responsabiliza\u00e7\u00e3o no lugar da Via\u00e7\u00e3o A\u00e9rea Riograndense S.A. (Varig), sem que tenha figurado como parte do processo desde o in\u00edcio, afrontou os princ\u00edpios do devido processo legal, do contradit\u00f3rio e da ampla defesa. <br><br><strong>Cl\u00e1usula de reserva<\/strong> <br><br>Ao dar provimento ao agravo, o ministro Gilmar Mendes observou que a mat\u00e9ria \u00e9 complexa desde o cancelamento, em 2003, da S\u00famula 205 do TST, que vedava a responsabiliza\u00e7\u00e3o solid\u00e1ria de empresa que n\u00e3o participou da rela\u00e7\u00e3o processual. A partir disso, o TST tem inclu\u00eddo empresas que integram o mesmo grupo econ\u00f4mico em processos de d\u00edvidas trabalhistas e as obrigando a arcar com as condena\u00e7\u00f5es. <br><br>Na avalia\u00e7\u00e3o do ministro, diante do par\u00e1grafo 5\u00ba do artigo 513 do CPC de 2015, que disciplinou o tema, a orienta\u00e7\u00e3o jurisprudencial do TST deve ser revista. Para ele, o tribunal desconsiderou a orienta\u00e7\u00e3o do CPC, em afronta \u00e0 S\u00famula Vinculante 10, que define ser reservado ao Plen\u00e1rio o julgamento da inconstitucionalidade de lei ou ato normativo que afaste sua incid\u00eancia. <br><br><a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"http:\/\/portal.stf.jus.br\/processos\/downloadPeca.asp?id=15347752593&amp;ext=.pdf\" target=\"_blank\"><strong>Leia a \u00edntegra da decis\u00e3o.<\/strong><\/a> <br><br><strong>Fonte:<\/strong>\u00a0STF<\/p>\n<\/div><\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ministro determinou ao TST que prolate nova decis\u00e3o com observ\u00e2ncia \u00e0 S\u00famula Vinculante 10 do STF e ao artigo 97 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o Federal.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":1384,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"disabled","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"disabled","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[47],"class_list":["post-1383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-boletim-juridico","tag-boletim-juridico-no-09-29-09-2021"],"aioseo_notices":[],"gutentor_comment":0,"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/boletim-juridico-2021-09a-pequena.jpg",250,167,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/boletim-juridico-2021-09a-pequena-150x150.jpg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/boletim-juridico-2021-09a-pequena.jpg",250,167,false],"medium_large":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/boletim-juridico-2021-09a-pequena.jpg",250,167,false],"large":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/boletim-juridico-2021-09a-pequena.jpg",250,167,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/boletim-juridico-2021-09a-pequena.jpg",250,167,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/boletim-juridico-2021-09a-pequena.jpg",250,167,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Rodrigo","author_link":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/author\/sinicesp\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Ministro determinou ao TST que prolate nova decis\u00e3o com observ\u00e2ncia \u00e0 S\u00famula Vinculante 10 do STF e ao artigo 97 da Constitui\u00e7\u00e3o Federal.","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1383"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1383\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/1384"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}