{"id":3683,"date":"2023-01-26T07:32:00","date_gmt":"2023-01-26T10:32:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/?p=3683"},"modified":"2023-01-24T14:23:11","modified_gmt":"2023-01-24T17:23:11","slug":"apos-alteracao-no-cpc-em-2021-extincao-do-processo-por-prescricao-intercorrente-impede-condenacao-em-honorarios","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/2023\/01\/26\/apos-alteracao-no-cpc-em-2021-extincao-do-processo-por-prescricao-intercorrente-impede-condenacao-em-honorarios\/","title":{"rendered":"Ap\u00f3s altera\u00e7\u00e3o no CPC em 2021, extin\u00e7\u00e3o do processo por prescri\u00e7\u00e3o intercorrente impede condena\u00e7\u00e3o em honor\u00e1rios"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<section class=\"wp-block-uagb-section uagb-section__wrap uagb-section__background-color uagb-block-a0312d3f\"><div class=\"uagb-section__overlay\"><\/div><div class=\"uagb-section__inner-wrap\">\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-uagb-advanced-heading uagb-block-401a8d12\"><h3 class=\"uagb-heading-text\"><br><strong>Boletim Jur\u00eddico n\u00ba 01\/2023 &#8211; 26\/01\/2023 <\/strong><\/h3><div class=\"uagb-separator\"><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n<\/div><\/section>\n\n\n\n<section class=\"wp-block-uagb-section uagb-section__wrap uagb-section__background-color uagb-block-a98365c1\"><div class=\"uagb-section__overlay\"><\/div><div class=\"uagb-section__inner-wrap\">\n<h2 class=\"has-text-color wp-block-heading\" id=\"stf-custas-poderao-ser-recolhidas-por-pix-ou-cartao-a-partir-de-abril\" style=\"color:#0767b1\"><strong><strong><strong><strong><strong>Ap\u00f3s altera\u00e7\u00e3o no CPC em 2021, extin\u00e7\u00e3o do processo por prescri\u00e7\u00e3o intercorrente impede condena\u00e7\u00e3o em honor\u00e1rios<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A Terceira Turma do Superior Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a (STJ) reformou&nbsp;ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o&nbsp;do Tribunal de Justi\u00e7a do Distrito Federal e dos Territ\u00f3rios (TJDFT) e afastou a condena\u00e7\u00e3o da parte que deu causa \u00e0 a\u00e7\u00e3o ao pagamento de honor\u00e1rios advocat\u00edcios e custas processuais.<br><br>Para o colegiado, ap\u00f3s a altera\u00e7\u00e3o do&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.planalto.gov.br\/ccivil_03\/_ato2015-2018\/2015\/lei\/l13105.htm#art921\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>artigo 921, par\u00e1grafo 5\u00ba, do C\u00f3digo de Processo Civil (CPC)<\/strong><\/a>&nbsp;pela Lei 14.195\/2021, o reconhecimento da&nbsp;prescri\u00e7\u00e3o&nbsp;intercorrente e a consequente extin\u00e7\u00e3o do processo impedem a imputa\u00e7\u00e3o de quaisquer \u00f4nus \u00e0s partes.<br><br>Na origem, em a\u00e7\u00e3o de execu\u00e7\u00e3o de c\u00e9dula de cr\u00e9dito banc\u00e1rio, o ju\u00edzo de primeiro grau julgou prescrita a pretens\u00e3o e, por consequ\u00eancia, extinguiu o processo com resolu\u00e7\u00e3o de&nbsp;m\u00e9rito.<br><br>Na&nbsp;apela\u00e7\u00e3o, apesar de o TJDFT manter a extin\u00e7\u00e3o do processo, condenou-se o executado ao pagamento de custas e honor\u00e1rios advocat\u00edcios, com fundamento no princ\u00edpio da causalidade, porque, &#8220;ao inadimplir a obriga\u00e7\u00e3o, deu causa ao processo&#8221; (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.planalto.gov.br\/ccivil_03\/_ato2015-2018\/2015\/lei\/l13105.htm#art85\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>artigo 85, par\u00e1grafo 10, do CPC\/15<\/strong><\/a>).<br><br>Ao interpor&nbsp;recurso especial, o executado pleiteou o afastamento da condena\u00e7\u00e3o ao pagamento de honor\u00e1rios sucumbenciais, sustentando que a&nbsp;senten\u00e7a&nbsp;foi proferida ap\u00f3s a altera\u00e7\u00e3o processual, promovida pela Lei 14.195\/2021. <br><br><strong>A impossibilidade de cobran\u00e7a est\u00e1 expressa na lei<\/strong><br><br>A relatora, ministra Nancy Andrighi, destacou que, antes da reforma legal, o STJ entendia que, embora n\u00e3o localizados bens penhor\u00e1veis para a quita\u00e7\u00e3o de seus d\u00e9bitos, a parte que motivou o ajuizamento do processo deveria arcar com o pagamento de custas e honor\u00e1rios advocat\u00edcios.<br><br>Todavia, a ministra observou que \u00e9 necess\u00e1rio rever esse entendimento da corte, tendo em vista a altera\u00e7\u00e3o do artigo 921, o qual disp\u00f5e expressamente que n\u00e3o ser\u00e3o imputados quaisquer \u00f4nus \u00e0s partes quando reconhecida a&nbsp;prescri\u00e7\u00e3o&nbsp;intercorrente, seja exequente, seja executada.<br><br><strong>Enquanto n\u00e3o for declarada a inconstitucionalidade, o dispositivo deve ser aplicado<\/strong><br><br>Nancy destacou que, para os processos em curso, a&nbsp;prola\u00e7\u00e3o&nbsp;da&nbsp;senten\u00e7a, ou de ato equivalente, \u00e9 o marco fixado para a aplica\u00e7\u00e3o da nova regra dos honor\u00e1rios, e n\u00e3o a verifica\u00e7\u00e3o da pr\u00f3pria&nbsp;prescri\u00e7\u00e3o&nbsp;intercorrente, motivo pelo qual n\u00e3o se deve aplicar o artigo 85, par\u00e1grafo 10, do CPC.<br><br>A ministra tamb\u00e9m apontou que, apesar de tramitar no Supremo Tribunal Federal (STF) a&nbsp;<a href=\"https:\/\/portal.stf.jus.br\/peticaoInicial\/verPeticaoInicial.asp?base=ADI&amp;numProcesso=7005\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\"><strong>A\u00e7\u00e3o Direta de Inconstitucionalidade 7.005<\/strong><\/a>, a qual trata, entre outros temas, da inconstitucionalidade formal e material das altera\u00e7\u00f5es acerca da&nbsp;prescri\u00e7\u00e3o&nbsp;intercorrente, enquanto n\u00e3o houver julgamento, deve-se obedecer \u00e0 legisla\u00e7\u00e3o vigente.<br><br><a href=\"https:\/\/processo.stj.jus.br\/processo\/revista\/documento\/mediado\/?componente=ITA&amp;sequencial=2235504&amp;num_registro=202202834330&amp;data=20221111&amp;formato=PDF\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\"><strong>Leia o ac\u00f3rd\u00e3o no REsp 2.025.303<\/strong><\/a>. <br><br><strong>Fonte<\/strong>: STJ<\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:70px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"section-ga31109\" class=\"wp-block-gutentor-e6 section-ga31109 gutentor-element gutentor-element-image text-align-center-desktop\"><div class=\"gutentor-element-image-box\"><a class=\"gutentor-element-image-link\" href=\"window.print()\"><div class=\"gutentor-image-thumb\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"normal-image\" src=\"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/impressora.png\" \/><\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Antes da reforma legal, a Corte entendia que a parte que motivou o ajuizamento do processo deveria arcar com o pagamento de custas e honor\u00e1rios advocat\u00edcios.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":3684,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"disabled","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"disabled","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[241],"class_list":["post-3683","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-boletim-juridico","tag-boletim-juridico-no-01-2023-26-01-2023"],"aioseo_notices":[],"gutentor_comment":0,"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/boletim-juridico-2023-01a-pequena.jpg",250,167,false],"thumbnail":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/boletim-juridico-2023-01a-pequena-150x150.jpg",150,150,true],"medium":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/boletim-juridico-2023-01a-pequena.jpg",250,167,false],"medium_large":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/boletim-juridico-2023-01a-pequena.jpg",250,167,false],"large":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/boletim-juridico-2023-01a-pequena.jpg",250,167,false],"1536x1536":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/boletim-juridico-2023-01a-pequena.jpg",250,167,false],"2048x2048":["https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/01\/boletim-juridico-2023-01a-pequena.jpg",250,167,false]},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Rodrigo","author_link":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/author\/sinicesp\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Antes da reforma legal, a Corte entendia que a parte que motivou o ajuizamento do processo deveria arcar com o pagamento de custas e honor\u00e1rios advocat\u00edcios.","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3683","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3683"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3683\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3684"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3683"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3683"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3683"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}