{"id":3878,"date":"2023-03-29T12:00:00","date_gmt":"2023-03-29T15:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/?p=3878"},"modified":"2023-03-29T13:00:20","modified_gmt":"2023-03-29T16:00:20","slug":"incidente-de-recursos-repetitivos-altera-entendimento-sobre-horas-extras-habituais-e-reflexos-do-dsr","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/2023\/03\/29\/incidente-de-recursos-repetitivos-altera-entendimento-sobre-horas-extras-habituais-e-reflexos-do-dsr\/","title":{"rendered":"Incidente de Recursos Repetitivos altera entendimento sobre horas extras habituais e reflexos do DSR"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<section class=\"wp-block-uagb-section uagb-section__wrap uagb-section__background-color uagb-block-522a52e3\"><div class=\"uagb-section__overlay\"><\/div><div class=\"uagb-section__inner-wrap\">\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-uagb-advanced-heading uagb-block-2bb88e92\"><h3 class=\"uagb-heading-text\"><br><strong>Boletim Jur\u00eddico n\u00ba 03\/2023 &#8211; 29\/03\/2023 <\/strong><\/h3><div class=\"uagb-separator\"><\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n<\/div><\/section>\n\n\n\n<section class=\"wp-block-uagb-section uagb-section__wrap uagb-section__background-color uagb-block-aea7953c\"><div class=\"uagb-section__overlay\"><\/div><div class=\"uagb-section__inner-wrap\">\n<h2 class=\"has-text-color wp-block-heading\" id=\"stf-custas-poderao-ser-recolhidas-por-pix-ou-cartao-a-partir-de-abril\" style=\"color:#0767b1\"><strong><strong><strong><strong><strong><strong>Incidente de Recursos Repetitivos altera entendimento sobre horas extras habituais e reflexos do DSR<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p> No dia 20 de mar\u00e7o de 2023, o pleno do Tribunal Superior do Trabalho julgou o Incidente de Recursos Repetitivos n\u00ba 9, que trata sobre o c\u00e1lculo das horas extras, alterando o entendimento da Orienta\u00e7\u00e3o Jurisprudencial 394 da SDI \u2013 1.<br><br><strong>A tese jur\u00eddica aprovada, que orientar\u00e1 a nova reda\u00e7\u00e3o da OJ 394, foi a seguinte<\/strong>:&nbsp;<br><br>REPOUSO SEMANAL REMUNERADO. INTEGRA\u00c7\u00c3O DAS HORAS EXTRAS. REPERCUSS\u00c3O NO C\u00c1LCULO DAS F\u00c9RIAS, D\u00c9CIMO TERCEIRO SAL\u00c1RIO, AVISO PR\u00c9VIO E DEP\u00d3SITOS DO FGTS.<br><br><strong>I<\/strong>. A majora\u00e7\u00e3o do valor do repouso semanal remunerado decorrente da integra\u00e7\u00e3o das horas extras habituais deve repercutir no c\u00e1lculo, efetuado pelo empregador, das demais parcelas que t\u00eam como base de c\u00e1lculo o sal\u00e1rio, n\u00e3o se cogitando de bis in idem por sua incid\u00eancia no c\u00e1lculo das f\u00e9rias, da gratifica\u00e7\u00e3o natalina, do aviso pr\u00e9vio e do FGTS.<br><br><strong>II<\/strong>. O item I ser\u00e1 aplicado \u00e0s horas extras trabalhadas a partir de 20.03.2023.<br><br>At\u00e9 ent\u00e3o, o Tribunal entendia que a inclus\u00e3o dos reflexos das horas extras em repousos semanais remunerados no c\u00e1lculo das demais verbas do contrato de trabalho, quais sejam, f\u00e9rias, gratifica\u00e7\u00e3o natalina, aviso pr\u00e9vio e FGTS, implicava em repeti\u00e7\u00e3o de um mesmo pagamento (<em>\u201cbis in idem\u201d<\/em>) e, por isso, indevida.<br><br>No julgamento em quest\u00e3o, venceu a tese de que a majora\u00e7\u00e3o do valor do RSR decorrente da integra\u00e7\u00e3o das horas extras habituais deve repercutir no c\u00e1lculo efetuado pelo empregador das demais parcelas que t\u00eam como base de c\u00e1lculo o sal\u00e1rio, n\u00e3o se cogitando de <em>\u201cbis in idem\u201d<\/em>.<br><br>O Tribunal modulou os efeitos do novo entendimento, passando a valer apenas para as horas extras realizadas a partir do dia 20 de mar\u00e7o 2023.<br><br>A decis\u00e3o ainda n\u00e3o foi disponibilizada.<br><br><strong>Fonte<\/strong>: DESIN FIESP<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:70px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"section-g564350\" class=\"wp-block-gutentor-e6 section-g564350 gutentor-element gutentor-element-image text-align-center-desktop\"><div class=\"gutentor-element-image-box\"><a class=\"gutentor-element-image-link\" href=\"window.print()\"><div class=\"gutentor-image-thumb\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"normal-image\" src=\"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/impressora.png\" \/><\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Julgamento foi suspenso e ser\u00e1 retomado com discuss\u00e3o sobre o marco temporal para a retomada de cobran\u00e7a dos tributos.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"disabled","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"disabled","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[283],"class_list":["post-3878","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-boletim-juridico","tag-boletim-juridico-no-03-2023-29-03-2023"],"aioseo_notices":[],"gutentor_comment":0,"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Ana Paula Amancio","author_link":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/author\/paula\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"Julgamento foi suspenso e ser\u00e1 retomado com discuss\u00e3o sobre o marco temporal para a retomada de cobran\u00e7a dos tributos.","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3878","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3878"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3878\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3878"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3878"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3878"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}