{"id":7978,"date":"2026-04-29T14:44:50","date_gmt":"2026-04-29T17:44:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/?p=7978"},"modified":"2026-04-29T14:44:54","modified_gmt":"2026-04-29T17:44:54","slug":"stj-cabe-anulatoria-nao-rescisoria-para-desconstituir-acordo-homologado","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/2026\/04\/29\/stj-cabe-anulatoria-nao-rescisoria-para-desconstituir-acordo-homologado\/","title":{"rendered":"STJ: Cabe anulat\u00f3ria, n\u00e3o rescis\u00f3ria, para desconstituir acordo homologado"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<section class=\"wp-block-uagb-section uagb-section__wrap uagb-section__background-color uagb-block-d5a5581e\"><div class=\"uagb-section__overlay\"><\/div><div class=\"uagb-section__inner-wrap\">\n<div style=\"height:10px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-uagb-advanced-heading uagb-block-36d776d1\"><h3 class=\"uagb-heading-text\"><br><strong>Boletim Jur\u00eddico n\u00ba 03 &#8211; 29\/04\/2026<\/strong><\/h3><div class=\"uagb-separator\"><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/section>\n\n\n\n<section class=\"wp-block-uagb-section uagb-section__wrap uagb-section__background-color uagb-block-39dd2c69\"><div class=\"uagb-section__overlay\"><\/div><div class=\"uagb-section__inner-wrap\">\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading has-text-color\" id=\"stf-custas-poderao-ser-recolhidas-por-pix-ou-cartao-a-partir-de-abril\" style=\"color:#0767b1\"><strong><strong><strong>STJ: Cabe anulat\u00f3ria, n\u00e3o rescis\u00f3ria, para desconstituir acordo homologado<\/strong><\/strong><\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:20px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><em>3\u00aa turma refor\u00e7ou car\u00e1ter excepcional da a\u00e7\u00e3o rescis\u00f3ria no CPC de 2015.<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>A via adequada para desconstituir senten\u00e7a homologat\u00f3ria de acordo \u00e9 a a\u00e7\u00e3o anulat\u00f3ria. Assim entendeu, por unanimidade, a 3\u00aa turma do STJ , afastando o cabimento de a\u00e7\u00e3o rescis\u00f3ria nessa hip\u00f3tese.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ao votar, a relatora, ministra Nancy Andrighi explicou que, nos termos do art. 966 do CPC, a a\u00e7\u00e3o rescis\u00f3ria \u00e9 medida excepcional, restrita a hip\u00f3teses taxativas de desconstitui\u00e7\u00e3o de decis\u00f5es de m\u00e9rito transitadas em julgado.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Pontuou que, sob a \u00e9gide do CPC de 1973, havia incerteza quanto \u00e0 via adequada para impugnar acordos homologados judicialmente, o que gerava diverg\u00eancia doutrin\u00e1ria.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Contudo, o CPC de 2015 solucionou a controv\u00e9rsia ao estabelecer, no \u00a74\u00ba do art. 966, que atos de disposi\u00e7\u00e3o de direitos praticados pelas partes e homologados pelo Judici\u00e1rio est\u00e3o sujeitos \u00e0 anula\u00e7\u00e3o.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Diante desse quadro, concluiu que a via adequada para desconstituir acordo homologado \u00e9 a a\u00e7\u00e3o anulat\u00f3ria, e n\u00e3o a rescis\u00f3ria.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Com isso, a turma conheceu e deu provimento ao recurso especial para determinar a remessa dos autos ao TJ\/SE, a fim de que seja dado prosseguimento \u00e0 a\u00e7\u00e3o anulat\u00f3ria.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Processo: <a href=\"https:\/\/processo.stj.jus.br\/processo\/pesquisa\/?src=1.1.2&amp;aplicacao=processos.ea&amp;tipoPesquisa=tipoPesquisaGenerica&amp;num_processo=REsp2230360\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\">REsp 2.230.360<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Fonte<\/strong>: <a href=\"https:\/\/www.migalhas.com.br\/quentes\/453965\/stj-cabe-anulatoria-nao-rescisoria-para-invalidar-acordo-homologado\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\" title=\"\">Migalhas<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:70px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div id=\"section-gae4aee\" class=\"wp-block-gutentor-e6 section-gae4aee gutentor-element gutentor-element-image text-align-center-desktop\"><div class=\"gutentor-element-image-box\"><a class=\"gutentor-element-image-link\" href=\"window.print()\"><div class=\"gutentor-image-thumb\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"normal-image\" src=\"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/01\/impressora.png\" \/><\/div><\/a><\/div><\/div>\n<\/div><\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>De acordo com o voto da relatora, a reda\u00e7\u00e3o do CPC\/2015 solucionou essa controv\u00e9rsia.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"om_disable_all_campaigns":false,"_uag_custom_page_level_css":"","_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"default","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"disabled","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"disabled","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"default","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"set","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[582],"class_list":["post-7978","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-boletim-juridico","tag-boletim-juridico-no-03-29-04-2026"],"aioseo_notices":[],"gutentor_comment":0,"uagb_featured_image_src":{"full":false,"thumbnail":false,"medium":false,"medium_large":false,"large":false,"1536x1536":false,"2048x2048":false},"uagb_author_info":{"display_name":"Rodrigo","author_link":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/author\/sinicesp\/"},"uagb_comment_info":0,"uagb_excerpt":"De acordo com o voto da relatora, a reda\u00e7\u00e3o do CPC\/2015 solucionou essa controv\u00e9rsia.","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7978","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7978"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7978\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7979,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7978\/revisions\/7979"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7978"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7978"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/sinicesp.org.br\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7978"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}